This study aims to compare and examine the perception on Japan and Joseon and the aspect of responses to the prohibition on the sale of poetical works by the authority in the poems by Moon Byeong-ran and Matuda Tokiko and to discuss the significance of their resistance. Though the environment they were in and where they lived were different, they intended to put emphasis on the point revealing overcoming imperialism of Japan, internal reflection, border-transcending solidarity, and spirit of humanism based on their own perception on Japan and Joseon each, trying to find the meaning of their perception. When the controlling-controlled structure disappeared and the voices of the desire for democratization began to spread after liberation, Moon Byeon-ran accepted lots of opinions of many citizens and students toward anti-autocracy as the people’s demands. Matuda Tokiko, on the other hand, focused on representing the perspective of proletarian class, that is to say wage earners and farmers, and the class taking the lead in criticizing the contradiction of capitalism. Therefore, the ideology and ideals that they pursued were different from each other. However, it was identified that they in common aimed for a society that they perceived without giving in to the tyranny of unlawful authority and suppression at all under the banner of resistance as seeking for the spirit of peace all the time with the thought that the division of Korea resulted from the plunder of Japanese imperialism, which is where the significance can be found.